The transporter soundtrack fighting man

The transporter soundtrack fighting man

The BD670 did a fairly good job with minimal bleed, but the Panasonic BDT210 did a better job of resolving the detail between the glowing red magma and the charred rock background. I ran the player the transporter soundtrack fighting man through 2 calibrated HDTVs Panasonic TC-P50ST30, Samsung LN40C670, and a calibrated JVC DLA RS25 projector, before plunking it down with the LG 55LW5600 55 3D LED HDTV for most of the testing review also forthcoming and didnt see too much evidence on real world content of poor chroma upconversion. The LG did pass the luma multiburst, chroma multiburst, luma zone plate, and both chroma upsampling error tests, so Im not sure what to make of the failed chroma zone plate test as it doesnt seem to have that noticeable an effect on real world program material. But the Panasonic BDT210 passed all of these tests as well as acing the Chroma zone plate test. P So does it matter?P It may if you view content on a really large screen and are very conscious of minute color details, but for most people the Blu-ray performance of the BD670 will be just plain fabulous. When it comes to deinterlacing performance, converting interlaced DVDs and 1080i Blu-ray Discs to 1080p progressive output, the BD670 is rock solid. My son loves watching the race car clip from Super Speedway which is used on several discs to test a players 2:3 cadence detection. If a player is able to detect this as a film-based 24 frame/second source, youll get clean details in the background grandstands. P If not, youll get major moir distortion in the grandstands curved lines that shouldnt be there. P So while Jake likes watching the car zoom around the track, I focus instead of the background. P What little moir I saw vanished faster than any player Ive tried to date. Impressive. The player also passed every cadence test we threw at it. The jaggies test didnt trip the player up, but it wasnt perfect. Certainly a little better than the Panasonic player. The performance with DVDs was equally as impressive using the HQV 0 Benchmark disc. P Unlike the Panasonic, the transporter soundtrack fighting man LG player lacks 24P output capability on DVDs so film-based standard def material may have some judder artifacts uneven motion unless your TV is able to detect and correct for that. The one area where the BD670 was disappointing was its disc-loading times. On some of the newer Blu-ray 3D discs Tangled, Gnomeo and Juliet, Despicable Me, it loaded quite quickly. On some of the torture Blu-rays like The Expendables and Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl, the LG was noticeably slower than the Panasonic. On The Expendables, the BD670 took 1 minute and 27 seconds before loading the Lionsgate gears. That isnt quick. POTC : COTBP took 38 seconds which is dramatically slower than the DMP-BDT2 On DVDs like Gladiator, the BD670 took 13 seconds to present the Dreamworks opening; the Panasonic took 17 in one of the rare instances where it was slower than the LG player. The BD-Live heavyP Inglourious Basterds took 59 seconds which is also quite average. Interestingly, the BD670 was faster with streaming media than the Panasonic 2 seconds faster accessing Netlfix and getting to a movie. Overall, the Panasonic is a faster loading player. Id call the BD670 average or below in this category. PIts no speed demon. Speed, however, should be secondary to image quality and thats where the Panasonic Blu-ray player has a big leg up on the LG.